Standard 1. The paper contains one or more surprising
results that nevertheless make sense in
some theoretical context.
Paper是否呈現其他理論所無法預測
的結果？
Standard 2.
The results presented in the paper are
of major theoretical or practical
significance.
Paper的結果是否具有理論或實務上
Standard 3.
The ideas in the paper are new and exciting, perhaps presenting a
new way of looking at an old problem.
Paper 提出的想法是否具新意與令人感到興奮？或是提供一個
看待老問題的新視點？
Standard 4.
The interpretation of results is unambiguous.
Paper是否對結果有清楚的詮釋？
Standard 5.
The paper integrates into a new, simpler framework data that had
previously required a complex, possibly unwieldy framework.
Paper是否將過去的理論框架或研究結果以更簡單的方式呈現？
Standard 6.
The paper contains a major debunking of previously held ideas.
Paper 是否揭露一些過去根深蒂固的想法或前提？
Standard 7.
The paper presents an experiment with a particularly clever
paradigm or experimental manipulation.
Paper是否呈現一個清楚的實驗典範或操弄？
Standard 8.
The findings or theory presented in the paper are general ones.
Paper中的理論或研究結果是否具廣泛類化的特性？
總之，一篇好的心理學文章，其理論框架及研究結果要具備新意 (new)、重要性 (significance)、可類化性(generality)，在呈現上也要清楚 (unambiguous)、簡單 (simpler) 且完整 (integrated)，才不會淹沒在茫茫的學術大海之中！
資料來源:
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The Psychologist's Companion: A Guide to
Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). The Psychologist's Companion: A Guide to
Scientific Writing for Students and Researchers.
沒有留言:
張貼留言